4.5 Article

The counterbend phenomenon in dynein-disabled rat sperm flagella and what it reveals about the interdoublet elasticity

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 89, 期 2, 页码 1165-1174

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.060681

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rat sperm that have been rendered passive by disabling the dynein motors with 50 mu M sodium metavanadate and 0.1 mM ATP exhibit an interesting response to imposed bending. When the proximal flagellum is bent with a microprobe, the portion of the flagellum distal to the probe contact point develops a bend in the direction opposite the imposed bend. This counterbend'' is not compatible with a simple elastic beam. It can be satisfactorily explained by the sliding tubule model of flagellar structure but only if there are permanent elastic connections between the outer doublets of the axoneme. The elastic component that contributes the bending torque for the counterbend does not reset to a new equilibrium position after an imposed bend but returns the flagellum to a nearly straight or slightly curved final position after release from the probe. This suggests it is based on fixed, rather than mobile, attachments. It is also disrupted by elastase or trypsin digestion, confirming that it is dependent on a protein linkage. Adopting the assumption that the elasticity is attributed to the nexin links that repeat at 96 nm intervals, we find an apparent elasticity for each link that ranges from 1.6 to 10 x 10(-5) N/ m. However, the elasticity is nonlinear and does not follow Hooke's law but appears to decrease with increased stretch. In addition, the responsible elastic elements must be able to stretch to more than 10 times their resting length without breakage to account for the observed counterbend formation. Elasticity created by some type of protein unfolding may be the only viable explanation consistent with both the extreme capacity for extension and the nonlinear character of the restoring force that is observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据