3.8 Article

Inorganic nitrogen dynamics in intertidal rocky biofilms and sediments of the Douro River estuary (Portugal)

期刊

ESTUARIES
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 592-607

出版社

ESTUARINE RESEARCH FEDERATION
DOI: 10.1007/BF02696070

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study rates of oxygen, ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3-), nitrite (NO2-), and nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes, nitrogen (N) fixation, nitrification, and denitrification were compared between two intertidal sites for which there is an abundant global literature, muddy and sandy sediments, and two sites representing the rocky intertidal zone where biogeochemical processes have scarcely been investigated. In almost all sites oxygen production rates greatly exceeded oxygen consumption rates. During daylight, NH4+ and NO3- uptake rates together with ammonification could supply the different N requirements of the primary producer communities at all four sites; N assimilation by benthic or epilithic primary producers was the major process of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) removal; N fixation, nitrification, and denitrification were minor processes in the overall light DIN cycle. At night, distinct DIN cycling processes took place in the four environments, denitrification rates ranged from 9 +/- 2 to 360 +/- 30 mu mol N-2 m(-2) h(-1), accounting for 10-48% of the water column NO3- uptake; nitrification rates varied from 0 to 1712 +/- 666 mu mol NH4+ m(-2) h(-1). A conceptual model of N cycle dynamics showed major differences between intertidal sediment and rocky sites in terms of the mean rates of DIN net fluxes and the processes involved, with rocky biofilm showing generally higher fluxes. Of particular significance, the intertidal rocky biofilms released 10 times the amount of N2O produced in intertidal sediments (up to 17 +/- 6 mu mol N2O m(-2) h(-1)), representing the highest N2O release rates ever recorded for marine systems. The biogeochemical contributions of intertidal rocky substrata to estuarine and coastal processes warrant future detailed investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据