4.7 Article

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (modified Eilber protocol) provides maximum local control and minimal morbidity in patients with soft tissue sarcoma

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 646-653

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2005.03.064

关键词

soft tissue sarcoma; limb-sparing surgery; combined-modality therapy; local control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Local recurrence rates of 15% to 30% after treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are still common but unacceptable. Our hypothesis was that a refined neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation protocol (modified Eilber protocol) improves local control rates while minimizing major morbidity. Methods: Consecutive patients with STS deep to the fascia of the extremity or trunk during 1984 to 1996 were treated with 3 days of doxorubicin (30 mg/day) and sequential radiation (300 cGy/day for 10 days). Wide excision with limb preservation was performed 4 to 8 weeks after radiation completion. Treatment complications, margins, local recurrence, and survival were prospectively documented. Results: Of 75 patients, 66% had tumors > 5 cm, and 71% were grade 2/3. In eight patients, negative margins were not achieved, and four of these had amputation (95% limb salvage). Three of the remaining four had local recurrence with a 5- and 7-year actuarial local control rate of 50% and 25%, respectively. In contrast, of the 67 patients with negative margins, a local control rate of 97% at 5 years and 94% at 7 years and an overall survival of 63% were achieved. Although margin (P =.001) and stage (P =.035) were correlated, these were not significant on multivariate Cox regression analysis. Risk factors for death included tumor stage (hazard ratio, 1.54; P =.001) and tumor grade (hazard ratio, 1.4; P =.02). Three patients (4%) required reoperation for tissue loss, and eight patients (10.6%) developed minor wound complications. Conclusions: This modified Eilber protocol seems to maximize local control and minimize major wound complications for extremity/truncal STS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据