4.6 Article

Induction of neutralizing antibodies and Th1-polarized and CD4-independent CD8+ T-Cell responses following delivery of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat protein by recombinant adenylate cyclase of Bordetella pertussis

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 79, 期 15, 页码 9872-9884

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.79.15.9872-9884.2005

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HIV-Tat, a conserved protein playing a key role in the early life cycle of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has been proposed as a potential AIDS vaccine. An HIV-Tat-based vaccine should elicit a broad, long-lasting, and neutralizing immune response. We have previously demonstrated that the adenylate cyclase (CyaA) from Bordetella pertussis targets dendritic cells and delivers CD8(+) and CD4(+) T-cell epitopes into the major histocompatibillity complex class I and class 11 presentation pathways. We have also showed that CyaA induced specific and protective cytotoxic T cell responses in vivo. Here, we designed a prototype vaccine based on the HIV type 1 Tat delivered by CyaA (CyaA-E5-Tat) and tested its capacity to induce HIV-Tat-specific cellular as well as antibody responses. We showed that immunization of mice by CyaA-E5-Tat in the absence of adjuvant elicited strong and long-lasting neutralizing anti-Tat antibody responses more efficient than those obtained after immunization with Tat toxoid in aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. Analyses of the anti-Tat immunoglobulin G isotypes and the cytokine pattern showed that CyaA-E5-Tat induced a Th1-pollarized immune response in contrast to the Th2-polarized immune responses obtained with the Tat toxoid. In addition, our data demonstrated that HIV-Tat-specific gamma interferon-producing CD8(+) T cells were generated after vaccination with CyaA-E5-Tat in a CD4(+) T-cell-independent manner. Based on these findings, CyaA-E5-Tat represents an attractive vaccine candidate for both preventive and therapeutic vaccination involving CyaA as an efficient nonreplicative vector for protein delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据