4.7 Article

Biochemical and physical factors affecting discoloration characteristics of 19 bovine muscles

期刊

MEAT SCIENCE
卷 70, 期 4, 页码 665-682

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.02.016

关键词

beef; color; metmyoglobin; muscles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Steaks from muscles (n = 19 from nine beef carcasses) were evaluated over the course of retail display (0-, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- or 5-d) for objective measures of discoloration (metmyoglobin, oxymyoglobin, L*-, a*-, and b*-values), reducing ability (metmyoglobin reductase activity (MRA), resistance to induced metmyoglobin formation (RIMF), and nitric oxide metmyoglobin reducing ability (NORA)), oxygen consumption rate (OCR), oxygen penetration depth, myoglobin content, oxidative rancidity, and pH. Muscles were grouped according to objective color measures of discoloration. M. longissimus lumborum, M. longissimus thoracis, M. semitendinosus, and M. tensor fasciae latae were grouped as high color stability muscles, M. semimembranosus, M. rectus femoris, and M. vastus lateralis were grouped as moderate color stability muscles, M. trapezius, M. gluteus medius, and M. latissimus dorsi were grouped as intermediate color stability muscles, M. triceps brachi - long head, M. biceps femoris, M. pectoralis profundus, M. adductor, M. triceps brachi - lateral head, and M. serratus ventralis were grouped as low color stability muscles, and M. supraspinatus, M. infraspinatus, and M. psoas major were grouped as very low color stability muscles. Generally, muscles of high color stability had high RIMF, nitric oxide reducing ability, and oxygen penetration depth and possessed low OCRs, myoglobin content, and oxidative rancidity. In contrast, muscles of low color stability had high MRA, OCRs, myoglobin content, and oxidative rancidity and low RIMF, NORA, and oxygen penetration depth. Data indicate that discoloration differences between muscles are related to the amount of reducing activity relative to the OCR. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据