4.4 Article

Evaluation of beta-absorbed fractions in a mouse model for 90Y, 188Re, 166Ho, 149Pm, 64Cu, and 177Lu radionuclides

期刊

CANCER BIOTHERAPY AND RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 436-449

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2005.20.436

关键词

Y-90; Re-188; Ho-166; Pm-149; Lu-177; Cu-64; beta-emitter dosimetry; Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) estimates; mouse model; molecular targeted radionuclide therapy; radioimmunotherapy; MCNP; PEREGRINE; small-scale dosimetry; S-factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several short-lived, high-energy beta emitters are being proposed as the radionuclide components for molecular-targeted potential cancer therapeutic agents. The laboratory mice used to determine the efficacy of these new agents have organs that are relatively small compared to the ranges of these high-energy particles. The dosimetry model developed by Hui et al. was extended to provide realistic beta-dose estimates for organs in mice that received therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals containing Y-90, Re-188, Ho-166, Pm-149, Cu-64, and Lu-177. Major organs in this model included the liver, spleen, kidneys, lungs, heart, stomach, small and large bowel, thyroid, pancreas, bone, marrow, carcass, and a 0.025-g tumor. The study as reported in this paper verifies their results for Y-90 and extends them by using their organ geometry factors combined with newly calculated organ self-absorbed fractions from PEREGRINE and MCNP. PEREGRINE and MCNP agree to within 8% for the worst-case organ with average differences (averaged over all organs) decreasing from 5% for Y-90 to 1% for Lu-177. When used with typical biodistribution data, the three different models predict doses that are in agreement to within 5% for the worst-case organ. The beta-absorbed fractions and cross-organ-deposited energy provided in this paper can be used by researchers to predict mouse-organ doses and should contribute to an improved understanding of the relationship between dose and radiation toxicity in mouse models where use of these isotopes is favorable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据