4.5 Article

Scavenger receptor class A type I/II (CD204) null mice fail to develop fibrosis following silica exposure

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00474.2004

关键词

inflammation; alveolar macrophages

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20-RR17670] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES-013044, ES-04804] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alveolar macrophages express the class A scavenger receptor (CD204) (Babaev VR, Gleaves LA, Carter KJ, Suzuki H, Kodama T, Fazio S, and Linton MF. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20: 2593-2599, 2000); yet its role in vivo in lung defense against environmental particles has not been clearly defined. In the current study, CD204 null mice (129Sv background) were used to investigate the link between CD204 and downstream events of inflammation and fibrosis following silica exposure in vivo. CD204(-/-) macrophages were shown to recognize and uptake silica in vitro, although this response was attenuated compared with 129Sv wild-type mice. The production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in lavage fluid was significantly enhanced in CD204 null mice compared with wild-type mice following silica exposure. Moreover, after exposure to environmental particles, CD204(-/-) macrophages exhibited improved cell viability in a dose-dependent manner compared with wild-type macrophages. Finally, histopathology from a murine model of chronic silicosis in 129Sv wild-type mice displayed typical focal lesions, interstitial thickening with increased connective tissue matrix, and cellular infiltrate into air space. In contrast, CD204(-/-) mice exhibited little to no deposition of collagen, yet they demonstrated enhanced accumulation of inflammatory cells largely composed of neutrophils. Our findings point to an important role of CD204 in mounting an efficient and appropriately regulated immune response against inhaled particles. Furthermore, these results indicate that the functions of CD204 are critical to the development of fibrosis and the resolution of inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据