4.5 Review

Directly transmitted unbalanced chromosome abnormalities and euchromatic variants

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
卷 42, 期 8, 页码 609-629

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2004.026955

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In total, 200 families were reviewed with directly transmitted, cytogenetically visible unbalanced chromosome abnormalities (UBCAs) or euchromatic variants (EVs). Both the 130 UBCA and 70 EV families were divided into three groups depending on the presence or absence of an abnormal phenotype in parents and offspring. No detectable phenotypic effect was evident in 23/130 (18%) UBCA families ascertained mostly through prenatal diagnosis ( group 1). In 30/130 (23%) families, the affected proband had the same UBCA as other phenotypically normal family members ( group 2). In the remaining 77/ 130 (59%) families, UBCAs had consistently mild consequences ( group 3). In the 70 families with established EVs of 8p23.1, 9p12, 9q12, 15q11.2, and 16p11.2, no phenotypic effect was apparent in 38/70 (54%). The same EV was found in affected probands and phenotypically normal family members in 30/70 families (43%) ( group 2), and an EV co-segregated with mild phenotypic anomalies in only 2/ 70 (3%) families ( group 3). Recent evidence indicates that EVs involve copy number variation of common paralogous gene and pseudogene sequences that are polymorphic in the normal population and only become visible at the cytogenetic level when copy number is high. The average size of the deletions and duplications in all three groups of UBCAs was close to 10 Mb, and these UBCAs and EVs form the Chromosome Anomaly Collection'' at http:// www. ngrl.org.uk/Wessex/ collection. The continuum of severity associated with UBCAs and the variability of the genome at the subcytogenetic level make further close collaboration between medical and laboratory staff essential to distinguish clinically silent variation from pathogenic rearrangement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据