4.7 Article

Role of natriuretic peptide receptor guanylyl cyclase-A in myocardial infarction evaluated using genetically engineered mice

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 46, 期 2, 页码 441-447

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000173420.31354.ef

关键词

receptors, angiotensin; coronary artery disease; hypertrophy; remodeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are elevated early after myocardial infarction (MI), the significance is not fully understood. We therefore investigated the function of natriuretic peptides after induction of MI in knockout ( KO) mice lacking the natriuretic peptide receptor guanylyl cyclase-A, the receptor for ANP and BNP. KO and wild-type (WT) mice were subjected to left coronary artery ligation and then followed up for 4 weeks. Irrespective of genotype, almost all deaths occurred within 1 week after induction of MI. KO mice showed significantly higher mortality because of a higher incidence of acute heart failure, which was associated with diminished water and sodium excretion and with higher cardiac levels of mRNAs encoding ANP, BNP, transforming growth factor-beta 1, and type I collagen. By 4 weeks after infarction, left ventricular remodeling, including myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis, and impairment of left ventricular systolic function were significantly more severe in KO than WT mice. Notably, the enhanced myocardial fibrosis seen in KO mice was virtually absent in infarcted double-KO mice, lacking guanylyl cyclase-A and angiotensin II type 1a receptors, although there was no improvement in survival and no attenuation of cardiac hypertrophy. Thus, guanylyl cyclase-A activation by endogenous cardiac natriuretic peptides protects against acute heart failure and attenuates chronic cardiac remodeling after MI. These beneficial effects are mediated partly through inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), although RAS-independent protective actions of guanylyl cyclase-A are also suggested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据