4.0 Article

The clinical features of respiratory syncytial virus: Lower respiratory tract infection after upper respiratory tract infection due to influenza virus

期刊

PEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 4, 页码 412-416

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.2005.02099.x

关键词

epidemiological interference; influenza virus; respiratory syncytial virus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza virus are the primary pathogens of respiratory tract infection. However, epidemics of influenza virus infection have been observed to interrupt RSV epidemics (termed an epidemiological interference effect). Methods: At a clinic in Tsuna county, Hyogo prefecture, Japan, a total of 1262 outpatients under 6 years of age with lower respiratory tract infection due to RSV (RSV-LRTI) and upper respiratory tract infection due to influenza virus (FLU-URTI) in three successive winter seasons (1999-2000, 2000-2001 and 2001-2002) were analyzed. Results: The RSV-LRTI epidemic and FLU-URTI epidemic overlapped in each season, but the RSV-LRTI epidemic peak preceded that of the FLU-URTI epidemic. Epidemiological interference between RSV and influenza virus was observed in the second and third season; the number of patients with RSV-LRTI began to decrease after the start of the FLU-URTI epidemic and recovered to some extent after the FLU-URTI epidemic passed its peak. There were no differences in onset age, male-to-female ratio and severity of RSV-LRTI in outpatients before and after the start of the FLU-URTI epidemic in all the three seasons. Conclusion: An epidemiological interference between RSV and influenza virus was observed in Tsuna county in two of the three winter seasons. However, there was no difference between the clinical features of the patients with RSV-LRTI before and after the start of the influenza virus infection epidemic. The data suggest that the clinical severity of RSV infection is not changed by the epidemiological interference effect of influenza virus infection epidemics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据