4.5 Article

Comet assay with the fish cell line rainbow trout gonad-2 for in vitro genotoxicity testing of xenobiotics and surface waters

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 24, 期 8, 页码 2078-2087

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1897/04-301R.1

关键词

comet assay; genotoxicity; fish cells; in vitro bioassay; surface water pollution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study examines the potential of the comet assay using the rainbow trout gonad cell line-2 (RTG-2) as an in vitro indicator test for genotoxicity assessment of aquatic contaminants and native surface waters. Initially, the comet assay protocol was adapted to the RTG-2 cell line. An exposure period of 2 h was found to be optimal, because DNA damage decreased when exposure was prolonged. Then, the sensitivity of the comet assay with RTG-2 cells toward six genotoxic reference substances was evaluated. The lowest-observed-effect concentration values for the directly acting genotoxins, 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, were in the low nanomolar range. The RTG-2 test system clearly was less sensitive for the indirectly acting genotoxins benzo[a]pyrene, nitrofurantoin, 2-acetylaminofluorene, and dimethylnitrosamine, despite the presence of xenobiotic metabolic capacities in RTG-2 cells. The two effect endpoints used, tail length (TL) and tail moment (TM), did not differ with respect to sensitivity, but the linearity of the concentration-response curve was better with TM than with TL. The overall reproducibility of the assay results was good. Finally, the applicability of the comet assay with RTG-2 cells for genotoxicity screening of native surface water samples was studied. The assay tolerated the use of nonsterile water samples and was able to detect genotoxic potentials in native water samples; that is, extraction and concentration of the samples were not needed. The results of the present study indicate the suitability of the comet assay with the fish cell line, RTG-2, as in vitro screen for detecting genotoxic potencies of xenobiotics and environmental samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据