4.6 Article

Structure, Function, and Insights into the Biosynthesis of a Head-to-Head Hydrocarbon in Shewanella oneidensis Strain MR-1

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 76, 期 12, 页码 3842-3849

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00433-10

关键词

-

资金

  1. Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment [LG-B13]
  2. Watson Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A polyolefinic hydrocarbon was found in nonpolar extracts of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 and identified as 3,6,9,12,15,19,22,25,28-hentriacontanonaene (compound I) by mass spectrometry, chemical modification, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Compound I was shown to be the product of a head-to-head fatty acid condensation biosynthetic pathway dependent on genes denoted as ole (for olefin biosynthesis). Four ole genes were present in S. oneidensis MR-1. Deletion of the entire oleABCD gene cluster led to the complete absence of nonpolar extractable products. Deletion of the oleC gene alone generated a strain that lacked compound I but produced a structurally analogous ketone. Complementation of the oleC gene eliminated formation of the ketone and restored the biosynthesis of compound I. A recombinant S. oneidensis strain containing oleA from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain R551-3 produced at least 17 related long-chain compounds in addition to compound I, 13 of which were identified as ketones. A potential role for OleA in head-to-head condensation was proposed. It was further proposed that long-chain polyunsaturated compounds aid in adapting cells to a rapid drop in temperature, based on three observations. In S. oneidensis wild-type cells, the cellular concentration of polyunsaturated compounds increased significantly with decreasing growth temperature. Second, the oleABCD deletion strain showed a significantly longer lag phase than the wild-type strain when shifted to a lower temperature. Lastly, compound I has been identified in a significant number of bacteria isolated from cold environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据