4.6 Article

Redirecting Reductant Flux into Hydrogen Production via Metabolic Engineering of Fermentative Carbon Metabolism in a Cyanobacterium

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 76, 期 15, 页码 5032-5038

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00862-10

关键词

-

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-05-1-0365]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some aquatic microbial oxygenic photoautotrophs (AMOPs) make hydrogen (H-2), a carbon-neutral, renewable product derived from water, in low yields during autofermentation (anaerobic metabolism) of intracellular carbohydrates previously stored during aerobic photosynthesis. We have constructed a mutant (the ldhA mutant) of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7002 lacking the enzyme for the NADH-dependent reduction of pyruvate to D-lactate, the major fermentative reductant sink in this AMOP. Both nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) metabolomic methods have shown that autofermentation by the ldhA mutant resulted in no D-lactate production and higher concentrations of excreted acetate, alanine, succinate, and hydrogen (up to 5-fold) compared to that by the wild type. The measured intracellular NAD(P)(H) concentrations demonstrated that the NAD(P)H/NAD(P)(+) ratio increased appreciably during autofermentation in the ldhA strain; we propose this to be the principal source of the observed increase in H2 production via an NADH-dependent, bidirectional [ NiFe] hydrogenase. Despite the elevated NAD(P)H/NAD(P)(+) ratio, no decrease was found in the rate of anaerobic conversion of stored carbohydrates. The measured energy conversion efficiency (ECE) from biomass (as glucose equivalents) converted to hydrogen in the ldhA mutant is 12%. Together with the unimpaired photoautotrophic growth of the ldhA mutant, these attributes reveal that metabolic engineering is an effective strategy to enhance H2 production in AMOPs without compromising viability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据