4.2 Article

Synthesis, characterization, and utilization of itaconate-based polymerizable surfactants for the preparation of surface-carboxylated polystyrene latexes

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pola.20768

关键词

carboxylated latex; surfactant; emulsion polymerization; polystyrene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two polymerizable surfactants (surfraers), namely, monododecyl itaconate (MDDI) and monocetyl itaconate (MCI), were synthesized by reacting itaconic anhydride with 1-dodecanol and cetyl alcohol, respectively. A series of uncrosslinked and crosslinked surface-carboxylated latexes were prepared from styrene and styrene-divinylbenzene, respectively, using varying amounts of these two surfraers. The latexes were characterized by gravimetry, dynamic light scattering, and conductometric titration in order to obtain the conversion, particle size distribution, and concentration of surface carboxyl groups, respectively. The size of latex varied between 41-72 mn and was seen to depend inversely on the surfmer concentration. In the case of the soluble polystyrene latexes, solution H-1 NMR spectra provided conclusive evidence for surfmer incorporation into the polymer chain. Comparison of the incorporation levels determined by NMR with the surface carboxylic acid concentrations in the latexes, determined by conductometric titrations, revealed that the majority of the surfraers, as ancticipated, were present on the latex surface. The study of the stability of the latexes to varying salt concentrations clearly demonstrated that the smaller-size latexes having higher surface carboxyl group density exhibited far improved stability when compared with the larger-size ones having lower surface carboxyl group density. Similarly, enhanced freeze-thaw stability was also observed for the smaller-size latexes. MCI-based latexes exhibited marginally improved stability compared with those prepared using MDDI, which again seems to be because of the higher surface functional group density in the former. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据