4.6 Article

The imprint of cosmological hydrogen recombination lines on the power spectrum of the CMB

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 438, 期 2, 页码 461-473

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052939

关键词

cosmic microwave background; cosmology : theory; early Universe; atomic processes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We explore the imprint of the cosmological hydrogen recombination lines on the power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). In particular, we focus on the three strongest lines for the Balmer, Paschen and Brackett series of hydrogen. We expect changes in the angular power spectrum due to these lines of about 0.3 mu K for the H alpha line, being maximum at small angular scales ( l approximate to 870). The morphology of the signal is very rich. It leads to relatively narrow spectral features (Delta nu/nu similar to 10(-1)), with several regions in the power spectrum showing a characteristic change of sign of the effect as we probe different redshifts or different multipoles by measuring the power spectrum at different frequencies. It also has a very peculiar dependence on the multipole scale, connected with the details of the transfer function at the epoch of scattering. In order to compute the optical depths for these transitions, we have numerically evolved the populations of the levels of the hydrogen atom during recombination, simultaneously treating the evolution of helium. For the hydrogen atom, we follow each angular momentum state separately, up to the level n = 10. Foregrounds and other frequency dependent contaminants such as Rayleigh scattering may be a important limitation for these measurements, although the peculiar frequency and angular dependences of the effect that we are discussing might permit us to separate it. Detection of this signal using future narrow-band spectral observations can give information about the details of how the cosmic recombination proceeds, and how Silk damping operates during recombination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据