4.4 Article

Galectin-3 expression in parathyroid carcinoma: immunohistochemical study of 26 cases

期刊

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
卷 36, 期 8, 页码 908-914

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.06.020

关键词

parathyroid carcinoma; galectin-3

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The diagnosis of parathyroid carcinoma (PC) is difficult and based on morphological features that are not totally reliable. Several molecular markers proved useful in the evaluation of PC, but their sensitivity, specificity, or both are rather low. With the aim of identifying a marker of malignancy in parathyroid tumors, we tested the expression of galectin-3 (Gal-3), a lectin expressed in several malignant tumors, including follicular carcinomas (but not adenomas) of the thyroid. Twenty-six PCs and 30 control parathyroid adenomas (PAs) were collected. The PCs had been diagnosed based on capsular/vascular invasion (26/26 cases), extraparathyroid infiltration (16), local recurrence (9), and distant metastases (6). All cases were immunohistochemically tested for Gal-3 and for other markers claimed to be useful in the differential diagnosis of parathyroid neoplasms, namely, Ki67, p27, and bcl2. Gal-3 was expressed by 24 of the PC (92.3%), but only 1 PA (3.3%) (P <.001). All metastasizing PCs were Gal-3-positive. As expected, the Ki67 proliferative index was higher in PCs (mean, 6.7%) than in PAs (1.9%); p27 was down-regulated in 61.5% of PCs and only 33.3% of PAs, whereas bcl2 was strongly positive in most PAs and in 38.5% of PCs. In a suspected PC, the association of Gal-3 with Ki67 (using a cutoff of 6% for the proliferative activity) appeared the best marker combination (sensitivity 96.2%, specificity 90%), and the profile Gal-3-positive/Ki67 > 6% was unique to PCs. We conclude that Gal-3 immunostaining is a valuable tool to support a diagnosis of PC in highly proliferating (Ki67 > 6%) tumors affecting a single parathyroid gland. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据