4.6 Article

Association of Hemolytic Activity of Pseudomonas entomophila, a Versatile Soil Bacterium, with Cyclic Lipopeptide Production

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 76, 期 3, 页码 910-921

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02112-09

关键词

-

资金

  1. CNRS [GDR 3048]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  3. Swiss National Fund [31003A_120709]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A-120121]
  5. Fonds National Suisse pour la Recherche Scientifique
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A-120121, 31003A_120709] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pseudomonas entomophila is an entomopathogenic bacterium that is able to infect and kill Drosophila melanogaster upon ingestion. Its genome sequence suggests that it is a versatile soil bacterium closely related to Pseudomonas putida. The GacS/GacA two-component system plays a key role in P. entomophila pathogenicity, controlling many putative virulence factors and AprA, a secreted protease important to escape the fly immune response. P. entomophila secretes a strong diffusible hemolytic activity. Here, we showed that this activity is linked to the production of a new cyclic lipopeptide containing 14 amino acids and a 3-C10OH fatty acid that we called entolysin. Three nonribosomal peptide synthetases (EtlA, EtlB, EtlC) were identified as responsible for entolysin biosynthesis. Two additional components (EtlR, MacAB) are necessary for its production and secretion. The P. entomophila GacS/GacA two-component system regulates entolysin production, and we demonstrated that its functioning requires two small RNAs and two RsmA-like proteins. Finally, entolysin is required for swarming motility, as described for other lipopeptides, but it does not participate in the virulence of P. entomophila for Drosophila. While investigating the physiological role of entolysin, we also uncovered new phenotypes associated with P. entomophila, including strong biocontrol abilities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据