4.6 Article

Effect of pH and Temperature on Denitrification Gene Expression and Activity in Pseudomonas mandelii

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 75, 期 12, 页码 3903-3911

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00080-09

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
  2. NSERC
  3. Canadian Foundation Innovation
  4. Ontario Innovation Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pseudomonas mandelii liquid cultures were studied to determine the effect of pH and temperature on denitrification gene expression, which was quantified by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Denitrification was measured by the accumulation of nitrous oxide (N2O) in the headspace in the presence of acetylene. Levels of gene expression of nirS and cnorB at pH 5 were 539-fold and 6,190-fold lower, respectively, than the levels of gene expression for cells grown at pH 6, 7, and 8 between 4 h and 8 h. Cumulative denitrification levels were 28 mu mol, 63 mu mol, and 22 mu mol at pH 6, 7, and 8, respectively, at 8 h, whereas negligible denitrification was measured at pH 5. P. mandelii cells grown at 20 degrees C and 30 degrees C exhibited 9-fold and 94-fold increases in levels of cnorB expression between 0 h and 2 h, respectively, and an average 17-fold increase in levels of nirS gene expression. In contrast, induction of cnorB and nirS gene expression for P. mandelii cells grown at 10 degrees C did not occur in the first 4 h. Levels of cumulative denitrification at 10 h were 6.6 mu mol for P. mandelii cells grown at 10 degrees C and 20 degrees C and 30 mu mol for cells grown at 30 degrees C. Overall, levels of cnorB and nirS expression were relatively insensitive to pH values over the range of pH 6 to 8 but were substantially reduced at pH 5, whereas gene expression was sensitive to temperature, with induction and time to achieve maximum gene expression delayed as the temperature decreased from 30 degrees C. Low pH and temperature negatively affected denitrification activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据