4.7 Article

Nicotine-free and salt-tolerant tobacco plants obtained by grafting to salinity-resistant rootstocks of tomato

期刊

PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM
卷 124, 期 4, 页码 465-475

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00532.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work we present the first study of the behaviour of tobacco plants, under saline conditions, grafted to salinity-resistant rootstocks of tomato cultivars. To test the viability and efficiency of this grafting technique in tobacco plants subjected to salinity, we analyse the production of foliar biomass and different quality parameters in this crop. With this aim, Nicotiana tabacum cv. Sevilla (scion) was grafted to two cultivars of Lycopersicum esculentum (rootstocks): cv. Jaguar (Sevilla/Jaguar) and cv. Brillante (Sevilla/Brillante). Furthermore, as controls, tobacco plants of cv. Sevilla were used grafted to themselves (Sevilla/Sevilla) and non-grafted plants of cv. Sevilla. Plants were grafted by needle graft following the procedure described by Rivero RM, Ruiz JM, Romero L (2002) Role of grafting in horticultural plants, pp 229-254. In the present work, we demonstrate that the graft of tobacco scions with tomato rootstocks is an effective agricultural approach to improve production and quality in tobacco leaves under conditions of saline stress. Our results show that the rootstock of the cv. Brillante best induced salt resistance in tobacco cv. Sevilla, registering the lowest foliar concentrations of Na+ and Cl-, the lowest lipid peroxidation and the highest proline and sugar concentrations. Overall, this is reflected in better biomass production of the aerial part of the plant. Finally, it is noteworthy that grafting in tobacco plants to tomato rootstocks essentially eliminates foliar nicotine levels (reduced to 1%). These results are of great importance, as this technique implies a rapid, efficient and natural alternative in increasing tobacco-leaf quality and thus reducing harmful effects of this alkaloid on the health of smokers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据