4.6 Article

Differential modulation of allergic eye disease by chronic and acute ascaris infection

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 46, 期 8, 页码 2772-2780

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0899

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. To assess alterations in allergic ocular responses to nonparasite antigens in an experimental system in which mice were skewed toward a Th2 cytokine profile by helminth infection. METHODS. Mice were inoculated with Ascaris suum ( A. suum) eggs concurrent with ragweed (RW) sensitization (RW/acute) or by repeated inoculation before RW sensitization (RW/ chronic). Control subjects were divided into RW, A. suum, and sham-sensitized groups. Animals were RW-challenged in the eye and examined for changes in ocular responses, inflammatory cell infiltrates, and in vitro assessment of cytokines after antigen restimulation. In subsequent experiments, CD4(+)/ CD25(+) T regulatory and CD4(+)/CD25(-) control T cells were adoptively transferred into mice before ocular challenge. RESULTS. RW sensitization and challenge increased ocular symptoms and eosinophil infiltration into the conjunctiva over PBS control eyes. Acute A. suum infection significantly increased RW-induced clinical symptoms and eosinophil infiltrates in the conjunctiva ( P = 0.0001) and resulted in the development of anterior uveitis. In contrast, RW/ chronic infection provided protection from allergic responses to RW with significantly fewer eosinophils in the eye and reduced eotaxin levels. Transfer of CD4(+)/CD25(+) T cells from RW/ chronic mice into RW/ acute animals also decreased disease intensity, suggesting that T regulatory cells may contribute to protection from allergic eye disease. CONCLUSIONS. The current studies suggest acute parasitic infections exacerbate allergic symptoms, whereas chronic infections offer protection and provide possible explanations for the role of parasitic infection in susceptibility and resistance to nonparasite allergens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据