4.6 Article

Identification and Functional Analysis of the Gene Cluster for L-Arabinose Utilization in Corynebacterium glutamicum

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 75, 期 11, 页码 3419-3429

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02912-08

关键词

-

资金

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 31831 grew on L-arabinose as the sole carbon source at a specific growth rate that was twice that on D-glucose. The gene cluster responsible for L-arabinose utilization comprised a six-cistron transcriptional unit with a total length of 7.8 kb. Three L-arabinose-catabolizing genes, araA (encoding L-arabinose isomerase), araB (L-ribulokinase), and araD (L-ribulose-5-phosphate4-epimerase), comprised the araBDA operon, upstream of which three other genes, araR (LacI-type transcriptional regulator), araE (L-arabinose transporter), and galM ( putative aldose 1-epimerase), were present in the opposite direction. Inactivation of the araA, araB, or araD gene eliminated growth on L-arabinose, and each of the gene products was functionally homologous to its Escherichia coli counterpart. Moreover, compared to the wild-type strain, an araE disruptant exhibited a > 80% decrease in the growth rate at a lower concentration of L-arabinose (3.6 g liter(-1)) but not at a higher concentration of L-arabinose ( 40 g liter(-1)). The expression of the araBDA operon and the araE gene was L-arabinose inducible and negatively regulated by the transcriptional regulator AraR. Disruption of araR eliminated the repression in the absence of L-arabinose. Expression of the regulon was not repressed by D-glucose, and simultaneous utilization of L-arabinose and D-glucose was observed in aerobically growing wild-type and araR deletion mutant cells. The regulatory mechanism of the L-arabinose regulon is, therefore, distinct from the carbon catabolite repression mechanism in other bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据