4.7 Article

Identification of four fimbria-encoding genomic islands that are highly specific for verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli serotype O157 strains

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 43, 期 8, 页码 3840-3850

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.8.3840-3850.2005

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli causes zoonotic food- or waterborne infection that may be associated with massive outbreaks and with the serious complication of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Serotypes O157:117 and O157:NM are more commonly associated with HUS and outbreaks than other serotypes, such as 026:H11. To determine whether a genetic basis exists for why serotype O157:H7/NM causes HUS and outbreaks more often than other serotypes, such as 026:1111, we conducted suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) between the genomes of the sequenced O157:117 strain EDL933 and CL1, a clinical serotype 026:1111 isolate. Genes from four EDL933 fimbria-encoding genomic O islands (OIs) (OI-1, -47, -141, and -154) were identified in the SSH library. OI-47 encodes several additional putative virulence factors, including secreted and signaling proteins, a hemolysin locus, a lipoprotein, an ABC transport system, and a lipid biosynthesis locus. The distribution of the OIs was investigated by PCR and Southern hybridization (when PCR was negative) with 69 VTEC strains belonging to 39 different serotypes corresponding to 5 seropathotypes that differ in their disease and epidemic potential. The four OIs described here were distributed almost exclusively in serotypes O157:117 and O157:NM, which indicates that they may be associated with the ability of these strains to colonize human and/or animal intestinal tracts and to cause epidemic and serious disease more frequently than other serotypes. The occurrence of the four OIs in enteropathogenic E. coli 055:117 strains is consistent with their vertical inheritance by VTEC O157:H7/NM from this clonally related ancestor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据