4.2 Article

Season- and age-related variation in neural cGnRH-I and cGnRH-II immunoreactivity in house sparrows (Passer domesticus)

期刊

GENERAL AND COMPARATIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 143, 期 1, 页码 33-39

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2005.02.019

关键词

GnRH; LHRH; photoperiod; reproduction; POA; septum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vertebrates exhibit several forms of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). In birds, chicken GnRH-I (cGnRH-I) is the primary hypophysiotropic form that regulates the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonad (HPG) axis. In seasonally breeding songbirds, cGnRH-I immunoreactivity is primarily in the preoptic septo-infidibular regions and varies greatly between the breeding and non-breeding season. Chicken GnRH-II (cGnRH-II) is more widely distributed throughout the avian brain, but cGnRH-II immunoreactivity has been found in the median eminence of quail. Thus, cGnRH-II may function in addition to cGnRH-I in the regulation of the HPG axis. If so, we predicted that cGnRH-II immunoreactivity should exhibit seasonal and age related variation similar to that observed for cGnRH-I. In this study, we compared hypothalamic immunoreactivity of cGnRH-I and -II (ir-cGnRH-I and ir-cGnRH-II) between breeding and non-breeding adult and juvenile house sparrows (Passer domesticus). We used immunocytochemistry with highly specific antibodies developed for quail to examine brains of free-living house sparrows collected in the breeding and non-breeding season. Results showed a greater number of ir-cGnRH-I cell bodies and beaded fibres in breeding adult birds compared to non-breeding adult and juvenile birds. Moreover, there were significantly more ir-cGnRH-II fibres in the preoptic area of breeding adult birds compared to non-breeding adult and juvenile birds. These data suggest that cGnRH-II undergoes seasonal- and age-related changes similar to cGnRH-I and implicate a role in regulating reproduction. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据