4.6 Article

Evaluation of pseudo-affective responses to noxious colorectal distension in rats by manometric recordings

期刊

PAIN
卷 116, 期 3, 页码 220-226

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.04.012

关键词

colorectal distension; fentanyl; rat; visceral pain; visceromotor response

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recordings of electromyographic (EMG) activity in the abdominal musculature are generally used to quantify the pseudo-affective visceromotor response induced by colorectal distension (CRD) in rodents. The present study describes a non-invasive, manometric method to quantify the magnitude of the abdominal contractions evoked by CRD. CRD-induced increases in EMG activity in female rats (electrical response) were compared to phasic changes in balloon pressure (mechanical response). A phasic increasing CRD paradigm from 10 to 80 mmHg with 10 mmHg intervals induced a clear stimulus-response relationship with a strong correlation (r(2)=0.93) between the electrical and mechanical responses. Twelve repeated phasic distensions at 80 mmHg increased the mechanical response by 133 +/- 53% (P < 0.01), while the electrical response only increased by 20 +/- 19% (P > 0.05), when comparing the last distension to the first. Atropine methyl bromide (1 mg/kg, i.v.) did not affect the mechanical response to distension at 80 mmHg, suggesting that colonic activity per se, does not contribute to the balloon pressure variations during CRD in the current experimental set-up. The p-opioid receptor agonist fentanyl at a dose of 1.5 mu g/kg (i.v.) significantly reduced the mechanical response to CRD (P < 0.01) while the electrical response was not affected. The present study shows that phasic bursts in EMG activity from the abdominal musculature occur simultaneously with balloon pressure variations, which may represent a non-invasive alternative to EMG recordings. Furthermore, the mechanical response is a more sensitive parameter for detecting both hyperalgesic and analgesic responses. (c) 2005 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据