4.6 Article

Daily administration of interleukin-18 causes myocardial dysfunction in healthy mice

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01179.2004

关键词

cytokines; heart failure; contractile function; calcium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although increased levels of circulating interleukin (IL)-18 have been demonstrated in patients with cardiovascular diseases, the functional consequences of chronically increased circulating IL-18 with respect to myocardial function have not been defined. Thus we aimed to examine the effects of chronic IL-18 exposure on left ventricular (LV) function in healthy mice. Moreover, to clarify whether IL-18 has direct effects on the cardiomyocyte, we examined effects of IL-18 on cardiomyocytes in vitro. After 7 days of daily intraperitoneal injections of 0.5 mu g IL-18 in healthy mice, a 40% ( P < 0.05) reduction in the LV maximal positive derivative, a 25% ( P < 0.05) reduction in the LV maximal rate of pressure decay, and a 2.8-fold ( P < 0.001) increase in the LV end-diastolic pressure were measured, consistent with myocardial dysfunction. Furthermore, we measured a 75% ( P < 0.05) reduction in beta-adrenergic responsiveness to isoproterenol. IL-18 induced myocardial hypertrophy, and there was a 2.9-fold increase ( P < 0.05) in atrial natriuretic peptide mRNA expression in the LV myocardium. In vitro examinations of isolated adult rat cardiomyocytes being stimulated with IL-18 (0.1 mu g/ml) exhibited an increase in peak Ca2+ transients ( P < 0.05) and in diastolic Ca2+ concentrations ( P < 0.05). In conclusion, this study shows that daily administration of IL-18 in healthy mice causes LV myocardial dysfunction and blunted beta-adrenergic responsiveness to isoproterenol. A direct effect of IL-18 on the cardiomyocyte in vitro was demonstrated, suggesting that IL-18 reduces the responsiveness of the myofilaments to Ca2+. Finally, induction of myocardial hypertrophy by IL-18 indicates a role for this cytokine in myocardial remodeling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据