4.7 Article

SLC26A9 is expressed in gastric surface epithelial cells, mediates Cl-/HCO-3 exchange, and is inhibited by NH+4

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 289, 期 2, 页码 C493-C505

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00030.2005

关键词

anion exchange; gastric bicarbonate secretion; peptic ulcer

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-54430, DK-62809] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HCO3- secretion by gastric mucous cells is essential for protection against acidic injury and peptic ulcer. Herein we report the identification of an apical HCO3- transporter in gastric surface epithelial cells. Northern hybridization and RT-PCR demonstrate the expression of this transporter, also known as SLC26A9, in mouse and rat stomach and trachea ( but not kidney). In situ hybridization in mouse stomach showed abundant expression of SLC26A9 in surface epithelial cells with apical localization on immunofluorescence labeling. Functional studies in HEK-293 cells demonstrated that SLC26A9 mediates Cl-/HCO3- exchange and is also capable of Cl--independent HCO3- extrusion. Unlike other anion exchangers or transport proteins reported to date, SLC26A9 activity is inhibited by ammonium (NH4+). The inhibitory effect of NH4+ on gastric HCO3- secretion was also indicated by reduced gastric juxtamucosal pH (pH(jm)) in rat stomach in vivo. This report is the first to describe the inhibition of HCO3- transport in vitro and the reduction of pHjm in stomach in vivo by NH4-. Given its critical localization on the apical membrane of surface epithelial cells, its ability to transport HCO3-, and its inhibition by NH4+, we propose that SLC26A9 mediates HCO3- secretion in surface epithelial cells and is essential for protection against acidic injury in the stomach. Disease states that are associated with increased ammonia (NH3)/NH4+ generation (e. g., Helicobacter pylori) may impair gastric HCO3- secretion and therefore predispose patients to peptic ulcer by inhibiting SLC26A9.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据