4.6 Article

The effects of particle and gas properties on the fluidization of Geldart A particles

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 60, 期 16, 页码 4567-4580

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2005.03.017

关键词

discrete particle simulation; Geldart A particles; fluidized bed; fluidization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on 3D computer simulations based on the soft-sphere discrete particle model (DPM) of Geldart A particles in a 3D gas-fluidized bed. The effects of particle and gas properties on the fluidization behavior of Geldart A particles are studied, with focus on the predictions of U-mf and U-mb, which are compared with the classical empirical correlations due to Abrahamsen and Geldart [1980. Powder Technology 26, 35-46]. It is found that the predicted minimum fluidization velocities are consistent with the correlation given by Abrahamsen and Geldart for all cases that we studied. The overshoot of the pressure drop near the minimum fluidization point is shown to be influenced by both particle-wall friction and the interparticle van der Waals forces. A qualitative agreement between the correlation and the simulation data for U-mb has been found for different particle-wall friction coefficients, interparticle van der Waals forces, particle densities, particle sizes, and gas densities. For fine particles with a diameter d(p) < 40 mu m, a deviation has been found between the U-mb from simulation and the correlation. This may be due to the fact that the interparticle van der Waals forces are not incorporated in the simulations, where it is expected that they play an important role in this size range. The simulation results obtained for different gas viscosities, however, display a different trend when compared with the correlation. We found that with an increasing gas shear viscosity the U-mb experiences a minimum point near 2.0 x 10(-5) Pa s, while in the correlation the minimum bubbling velocity decreases monotonously for increasing mu g. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据