4.6 Article

Diurnal and acute patterns of postprandial apolipoprotein B-48 in VLDL, IDL, and LDL from normolipidemic humans

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 181, 期 2, 页码 345-351

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.12.045

关键词

metabolism; coronary heart disease; triglyceride; cholesterol

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 69376, R01-HL56210] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Smaller size particles of intestinal origin may be more relevant to atherosclerosis than larger particles because of easier transendothelial transport. We examined the diurnal pattern in response to low-fat high-carbohydrate meals and the effect of a single high-fat milkshake on apoB-48 in very light S(f)degrees > 400, light S(f)degrees 60-400, and dense S(f)degrees 20-60 VLDL, IDL, and LDL in 24 subjects (12 in each study). After the high-fat meal, apoB-48 concentrations peaked at 3 h for very light VLDL, 4 h for light VLDL, and 5 h for dense VLDL and IDL, suggesting a delipidation cascade. The diurnal pattern was characterized by a sharp increase in light and dense VLDL apoB-48 after breakfast, reaching the highest concentration 4-8 h after breakfast. Less response was observed after lunch, dinner or snack, despite 75% of energy supplied by these meals. The proportion of apoB-48 in LDL in the fasting state ranged between 48 and 54%. LDL apoB-48 concentration decreased by 35% after the high-fat meal, and slowly recovered to near fasting concentrations after 10-12 h. In contrast, in the diurnal study, LDL apoB-48 concentration steady increased peaking 13 h after breakfast, followed by a sharp decrease. In sum, most intestinally synthesized apoB lipoproteins circulate in LDL, and are likely formed in the late postprandial period from larger VLDL-size particles. Although small apoB-48 lipoproteins may be atherogenic remnant particles, their very low concentration may diminish their clinical significance. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据