4.5 Article

Early-onset obsessive-compulsive disorder: a subgroup with a specific clinical and familial pattern?

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
卷 46, 期 8, 页码 881-887

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00382.x

关键词

Obsessive-compulsive disorder; genetics; family history

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The familial nature of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been previously demonstrated. The identification of candidate symptoms such as age at onset may help to disentangle the clinical and genetic heterogeneity of the disorder. In this study, the specificity of early-onset OCD was investigated, focusing on the effect of gender, comorbid conditions and familial risk of tics and OCD by studying a population consisting exclusively of patients with early-onset OCD. One hundred and forty-four patients having OCD were recruited in the study (108 early-onset probands and 36 late-onset probands). The early-onset probands and 199 of their first-degree relatives were investigated using structured interviews and questionnaires. This sample of early onset was mainly composed of children and adolescents (74 children and adolescents and 34 adults). The average age of onset of OCD is 9.98 +/- 3.2 years. Forty-four per cent of the probands have a comorbid tic disorder. The age-corrected morbid risk among the first-degree relatives is 17% for OCD and 12% for tics. Morbid risk for OCD and tics was independent of the presence of tics in probands. Only 32.6% of the probands have a positive family history of OCD. These findings are consistent with other reports in the literature that the morbid risk of OCD is elevated in relatives of probands with early-onset OCD. However, the majority of cases do not have a positive family history of OCD. This result suggests that early onset is not the only specific clinical marker for familial risk in OCD. Thus more work is needed to clearly elucidate other factors related to increased genetic vulnerability for OCD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据