4.8 Article

The voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.3 is highly expressed on inflammatory infiltrates in multiple sclerosis brain

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0501770102

关键词

lymphocytes; macrophages; cerebrospinal fluid; effector memory

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [F32 CA090073] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS048252, R37 NS041435, R01 NS042011, NS 048252, NS 041435, R01 NS041435, NS 42011] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is characterized by central nervous system perivenular and parenchymal mononuclear cell infiltrates consisting of activated T cells and macrophages. We recently demonstrated that elevated expression of the voltage-gated potassium channel, Kv1.3, is a functional marker of activated effector memory T (T-EM) cells in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis and in myelin-specific T cells derived from the peripheral blood of patients with MS. Herein, we show that Kv1.3 is highly expressed in postmortem MS brain inflammatory infiltrates. The expression pattern revealed not only Kv1.3(+) T cells in the perivenular infiltrate but also high expression in the parenchyma of demyelinated MS lesions and both normal appearing gray and white matter. These cells were uniformly chemokine receptor 7 negative (CCR7(-)), consistent with an effector memory phenotype. Using double-labeling immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy, we demonstrated colocalization of Kv1.3 with CD3, CD4, CD8, and some CD68 cells. The expression patterns mirrored in vitro experiments showing polarization of Kv1.3 to the immunological synapse. Kv1.3 was expressed in low to moderate levels on CCR7(+) central memory T cells from cerebrospinal fluid, but, when these cells were stimulated in vitro, they rapidly became Kv1.3(high)/CCR7-T-EM, suggesting that a subset of cerebrospinal fluid cells existed in a primed state ready to become TEM. These studies provide further rationale for the use of specific Kv1.3 antagonists in MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据