4.8 Article

Contribution of T cell receptor affinity to overall avidity for virus-specific CD8+ T cell responses

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0504851102

关键词

avidity; influenza A virus; T cell receptor repertoire; TCR affinity

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA21765, P30 CA021765] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI29579, R37 AI029579] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prior analysis has characterized the clonal characteristics of effector CD8(+) T cells specific for the prominent influenza A virus nucleoprotein (NIP) and acid polymerase (PA) peptides presented by H2D(b). Using a single-cell approach and determination of CDR3 beta profiles, a limited, predominantly public repertoire was found for CD8(+)D(b)NP(366)+V beta 8.3(+) cells, whereas diverse and private T cell antigen receptor (TCR)beta clonotypes were typical of the CD8(+)DbPA(224)+V beta 7(+) response. This single-cell approach has now been used to relate the contributions of particular clonotypes (or affinities) to high-avidity TCRs, as defined by binding under conditions of limiting tetramer availability. At least by the measure of CDR3 beta usage, no difference could be found between total and high-avidity populations in the spectrum of TCR-pMHC affinities throughout the limited, and relatively public, CD8(+)D(b)NP(366)(+)V beta 8.3(+) populations. Conversely, the more even (by clone size), diverse, and private CD8(+)D(b)PA(224)(+)beta 7(+) response was characterized by the clear partitioning of the largest T cell clones in the high-avidity compartment. These results suggest that the relatively constrained CD8(+)D(b)NP(366)(+)V beta 8.3(+) set utilizes a relatively narrow range of affinities, whereas the broader CD8(+)D(b)PA(2.24)(+)V beta 7(+) response is induced at a range of TCR-pMHC affinities. Thus, whereas TCR sequence (or affinity) appears to contribute substantially to the avidity profile of diverse virus-specific CD8(+) populations, other mechanisms may be prominent where the TCR spectrum is more limited.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据