4.7 Article

Evaluation of generalized cross-correlation methods for direction of arrival estimation using two microphones in real environments

期刊

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
卷 73, 期 8, 页码 698-712

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.02.002

关键词

Direction of arrival; Generalized cross-correlation; Spatially correlated signals

资金

  1. University of Jaen
  2. Caja Rural de Jaen (Spain) [2009/12/12]
  3. Science and Innovation Department of the Spanish Government [TIN2011-27512-C05-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The localization of sound sources, and particularly speech, has a numerous number of applications to the industry. This has motivated a continuous effort in developing robust direction-of-arrival detection algorithms, in order to overcome the limitations imposed by real scenarios, such as multiple reflections and undesirable noise sources. Time difference of arrival-based methods, and particularly, generalized cross-correlation approaches have been widely investigated in acoustic signal processing, but there is considerable lack in the technical literature about their evaluation in real environments when only two microphones are used. In this work, four generalized cross-correlation methods for localization of speech sources with two microphones have been analyzed in different real scenarios with a stationary noise source. Furthermore, these scenarios have been acoustically characterized, in order to relate the behavior of these cross-correlation methods with the acoustic properties of noisy scenarios. The scope of this study is not only to assess the accuracy and reliability of a set of well-known localization algorithms, but also to determine how the different acoustic properties of the room under analysis have a determinant influence in the final results, by incorporating in the analysis additional factors to the reverberation time and signal-to-noise ratio. Results of this study have outlined the influence of the acoustic properties analysed in the performance of these methods. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据