4.7 Article

Phytotoxic activity of bibenzyl derivatives from the orchid Epidendrum rigidum

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 53, 期 16, 页码 6276-6280

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf0508044

关键词

Epidendrum rigidum; orchidaceae; bibenzyls; phenantrenes; stilbenoids; phytotoxicity; cytotoxicity; Lemna pausicostata; duckweed; Amaranthus hypochondriacus; gigantol; batatsin III

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A whole plant chloroform-methanol extract of the orchid Epidendrum rigidum inhibited radicle growth of Amaranthus hypochondriacus seedlings (IC50 = 300,mu g/mL). Bioassay-guided fractionation furnished four phytotoxins, namely, gigantol (1), batatasin 111 (2), 2,3-dimethoxy-9,10-dihydrophenathrene-4,7-diol (9),: and 3,4,9-trimethoxyphenanthrene-2,5-diol (11), along with the known flavonoids apigenin, vitexin, and isovetin and the triterterpenoids 24,24-dimethyl-9,19-cyclolanostane-25-en-3 beta-ol (14) and 24-methyl-9,19-cyclolanostane-25-en-3 beta-ol (15). Stilbenoids 1, 2, 9, and 11 inhibited radicle growth of A. hypochondriacus with IC50 values of 0.65, 0.1, 0,12, and 5.9 mu M, respectively. Foliar application of gigantol (1) at 1 mu M to 4 week old seedlings of A. hypochondriacus reduced shoot elongation by 69% and fresh weight accumulation by 54%. Bibenzyls 1 and 2, as well as synthetic analogues 4'-hydroxy-3,3',5-trimethoxybibenzyl (3), 3,3',4',5-tetramethoxybibenzyl (4), 3,4'-dihydroxy-5-methoxy-bibenzyl (5), 3'-O-methylbatatasin 111 (6), 3,3',5-trihydroxybibenzyl (7), and 3,4',5-trihydroxybibenzyl (8), were tested for phytotoxicity in axenic cultures of the small aquatic plant Lemna pausicostata. All bibenzyls derivatives except 7 and 8 inhibited growth and increased cellular leakage with IC50 values of 89.9-180 and 89.9-166 mu M, respectively. The natural and synthetic bibenzyls showed marginal cytotoxicity on animal cells. The results suggest that orchid bibenzyls may be good lead compounds for the development of novel herbicidal agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据