4.7 Article

Boron isotope geochemistry of Paleozoic brachiopod calcite:: Implications for a secular change in the boron isotope geochemistry of seawater over the Phanerozoic

期刊

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 69, 期 16, 页码 4035-4044

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2004.11.017

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Boron isotope composition of marine carbonates has been proposed as a paleo-pH proxy and potential tool to reconstruct atmospheric pCO(2). The precise knowledge of the boron isotopic composition of ancient seawater represents the fundamental prerequisite for any paleo-pH reconstruction. This contribution presents boron isotope values for Silurian to Permian brachiopod calcite that might be used to reconstruct pH or boron isotope composition of past oceans. All brachiopod shells were screened for diagenetic recrystallization by means of cathodoluminescence microscopy, trace element geochemistry (B, Fe, Mn, Sr) as well as SEM. Only nonluminescent shells revealing well-preserved microstructures, high strontium and boron concentrations as well as low iron and manganese contents were accepted for boron isotope analysis. The boron isotope ratios of Silurian, Devonian, Pennsylvanian and Permian brachiopod calcite range from 6.8 to 11.0 parts per thousand 7.3 to 14.9 parts per thousand, 12.4 to 15.8 parts per thousand and 10.1 to 11.7 parts per thousand, respectively. These delta B-11 values are significantly lower in comparison to delta B-11 values of modern biogenic carbonates and indicate that the Paleozoic oceans were depleted in B-11 by up to 10 parts per thousand. Box modeling of the boron geochemical cycle suggests that the significant depletion of B-11 in the oceanic reservoir may have been initiated by an enhanced continental boron discharge. Our data support the earlier made conclusion that boron isotopes may not be used in the geological past as reliable paleo-pH proxy unless the boron isotopic composition of ancient oceans can be constrained by further studies. Copyright (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据