4.7 Article

Immunomodulatory drug CC-5013 or CC-4047 and rituximab enhance antitumor activity in a severe combined immunodeficient mouse lymphoma model

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 16, 页码 5984-5992

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0577

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New thalidomide derivatives CC-5013 and CC-4047 (immunomodulatory drugs, MID) are up to 10,000 times more potent than Thalidomide. The biological effects of IMiDs are presumed to be mediated by (a) activation of some components of the innate [natural killer (NK) cells] or adoptive immune system (T cells), (b) modification of cytokine microenvironment in the tumor bed, or by (c) inhibition of angiogenesis. In this article, we tested an innovative combination strategy involving rituximab and IMiDs in aggressive lymphoma cell lines and human lymphoma xenografts. Treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma cells with CC-5013 resulted in a 40% to 70% growth inhibition when compared with controls (P < 0.05). Exposure of lymphoma cells to CC-4047 resulted in a lesser degree of growth inhibition. Induction of apoptosis was shown in 10% to 26% of lymphoma cells 24 hours following exposure to either IMi D. In vivo studies in severe combined immunodeficient mice showed synergistic activity between CC-4047 (and to a lesser degree, CC-5013) plus rituximab. Animals treated with the CC-4047/rituximab combination had a median survival of 74 days (P = 0.0012) compared with 58 days (P = 0.167) in CC-5013/rituximab-treated animals compared with 45 days in rituximab monotherapy - treated animals-The synergistic effect between IMiDs and rituximab in our mouse model was attributed to NK cell expansion. The enhancement of rituximab activity by IMiDs was abrogated by in vivo depletion of NK cells. Augmenting NK cell function by CC-4047 or CC-5013 exposure may increase the antitumor effects of rituximab against B-cell lymphomas and warrants further exploration in the context of a clinical trial.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据