4.8 Article

The potential use of hydrazine as an alternative to peroxidase in a biosensor: comparison between hydrazine and HRP-based glucose sensors

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 257-265

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2004.09.036

关键词

amperometry; conducting polymer; glucose biosensor; glucose oxidase; horseradish peroxidase; hydrazine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential use of hydrazine sulfate was examined for the catalytic reduction of enzymatically generated H2O2 in a biosensor system. The performance of the hydrazine-based sensor was compared with an HRP-based glucose sensor as a model of a biosensor. Hydrazine and HRP were covalently immobilized onto a conducting polymer layer with glucose oxidase. The direct electron transfer reactions of the immobilized hydrazine and HRP onto the poly-5,2':5,2-terthiophene-3'-carboxylic acid (poly-TTCA) layer were investigated by using cyclic voltammetric method and the electron transfer rate constants were determined. The glucose oxidase- and hydrazine-immobilized sensor efficiently reduced the enzymatically generated H2O2 at -0.15 V versus Ag/AgCl. The surface of this GO(x)/hydrazine/poly-TTCA-based glucose sensor was characterized by QCM, SEM, and ESCA. Glucose-sensing properties were studied using cyclic voltammetric and chronoamperometric techniques. Various experimental parameters were optimized according to the amount of hydrazine, pH, the temperature, and the applied potential. A linear calibration plot was obtained in the concentration range between 0.1 and 15.0 mM, and the detection limit was determined to be 40.0 +/- 7.0 mu m. Interferences from other biological compounds were studied. The long-term stability of the GO(x)/hydrazine sensor was better than that of the one based on a GO(x)/HRP biosensor. The proposed glucose sensor was successfully applied to human whole blood and urine samples for the detection of glucose. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据