4.7 Article

Neurocognitive consequences of risk-adapted therapy for childhood medulloblastorna

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 23, 期 24, 页码 5511-5519

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.703

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30CA21765, R01CA78957, U01CA81445] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose This prospective, longitudinal study examined the effects of risk-adapted craniospinal irradiation (CSI) dose and the interactions of dose with age and time from diagnosis on intelligence quotient (IQ) and academic achievement (reading, spelling, and math) among patients treated for medulloblastoma (MB). Patients and Methods Patients received serial neurocognitive testing spanning from 0 to 6.03 years after diagnosis (median, 3.14 years). The multi-institutional study included 111 patients, who were 3 to 20 years of age at diagnosis (median age, 7.4 years), treated for IMB with risk-adapted CSI followed by four cycles of high-dose chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and vincristine) with stem-cell support. High-risk patients (HR; n = 37) received CSI to 36 to 39.6 Gy and conformal boost treatment of the primary site to 55.8 to 59.4 Gy. Average-risk patients (AR; In = 74) received CSI to 23.4 Gy and conformal boost treatment of the posterior fossa to 36.0 Gy and primary site to 55.8 Gy. Results Multivariate modeling revealed statistically significant declines in mean IQ (-1.59 points/yr; P =.006), reading (-2.95 points/yr; P <.0001), spelling (-2.94 points/yr; P <.0001), and math (-1.87 points/yr; P =.003) scores for the entire group. The effects of risk-adapted radiation therapy on IQ, reading, and spelling were moderated by age, with the greatest rates of decline observed for the HR patients who were younger (< 7 years old) at diagnosis. Conclusion Young age at diagnosis was the most prominent risk factor for neurocognitive deficits among survivors of MB despite reductions in CSI dosing and efforts to limit the boost volume. Younger patients exhibited substantial problems with the development of reading skills.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据