4.7 Article

The effect of nanocrystal surface structure on the luminescence properties:: Photoemission study of HF-etched InP nanocrystals -: art. no. 084706

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 123, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2004901

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

InP nanocrystals with narrow size distribution and mean particle diameter tunable from similar to 2 up to similar to 7 nm were synthesized via the dehalosilylation reaction between InCl3 and tris(trimethylsilyl)phosphine. Specific capping of the nanocrystal surface with a shell of organic ligands protects the nanocrystals from oxidation and provides solubility of the particles in various organic solvents. InP nanocrystals with enhanced photoluminescence (PL) efficiency were obtained from the initial nanocrystals by photoassisted etching of the nanocrystal surface with HF. The resulting PL quantum efficiency of InP nanocrystals dispersed in n-butanol is about three orders of magnitude higher when compared to the nonetched InP samples and approaches similar to 40% at room temperature. High-resolution photoelectron spectroscopy with the use of synchrotron radiation was applied to reveal the changes of the nanocrystal surface responsible for the dramatic improvement of the PL efficiency. The analysis of high-resolution P 2p core-level spectra confirmed significant changes of the nanocrystal surface structure induced by the postpreparative treatments and allowed us to propose the description of the etching mechanism. In the nonetched InP nanocrystals, some surface P atoms generate energy states located inside the band gap which provide nonradiative recombination pathways. Photoassisted treatment of InP nanocrystals with HF results in selective removal of these phosphorous atoms from the nanocrystal surface. The reconstructed surface of the etched InP nanocrystals is terminated mainly with In atoms and is efficiently passivated with tri-n-octylphosphine oxide ligands. (c) 2005 American Institute of Physics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据