4.7 Article

Computationally designed monomers and polymers for molecular imprinting of theophylline - part II

期刊

POLYMER
卷 46, 期 18, 页码 7543-7556

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.146

关键词

imprinting polymers; ligand; molecular simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main objective of this research is to develop and apply state-of-the-art Computational tools to achieve an understanding of intermolecular interactions in molecular imprinting of theophylline into complex polymeric systems. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were carried out for different molecular systems in order to predict the interaction energies, the closest approach distances and the active site groups between the simulated molecular systems and different bio-ligands. The minimized structures of five ligands, theophylline, and its derivatives (theobromme, theophylline-8-butanoic acid, caffeine and theophylline-7-acetic acid) have been obtained with the use of molecular mechanics approach. NVT MD simulations at room temperature were carried out to obtain equilibrated conformations in all cases. The first simulated molecular systems consisted of a ligand and commonly used functional monomers, polymers and a substrate. The second simulated molecular systems consisted of a ligand and a monomer or polymer using a solvent (ethanol). During this study, it was found that electrostatic interactions play the most significant role in the formation of molecular imprinting materials. The simulated functional monomers and polymers with ligands indicate that the functional groups interacting with ligands tends to be either -COOH or CH2=CH-. It was also found that molecular substrate without functional side groups are recommended for molecular imprinting technology. For both the solvated monomer and polymer systems is that it appears that the presence of the solvent appears. to favour the formation of more stable clusters with theophylline than with its derivatives. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据