4.4 Article

Genetic susceptibility to simple febrile seizures:: Interleukin-1β promoter polymorphisms are associated with sporadic cases

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 384, 期 3, 页码 239-244

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.04.097

关键词

simple febrile seizures; polymorphism; interleukin-1 beta; gene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Febrile seizures (FSs) are the commonest form of convulsions. A genetic predisposition to FSs is known, based on family studies, twin studies, and complex segregation analysis. Simple FSs may be more homogenous in their clinical manifestations, and show better agreement with the multifactorial inheritance theory than the complex type. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) beta is one of the pro-inflammatory cytokines that are postulated to be involved in the development of FSs. To determine whether or not function-related polymorphisms of the IL-1 beta (IL1B) gene are associated with susceptibility to simple FSs, the genotypes for two biallelic polymorphisms in the promoter region at positions -31 and -511 of the ILIB gene were determined by means of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism in 229 FS patients (108 sporadic and 60 familial simple FS. and 61 complex FS patients) and 158 controls. ILIB-31C/T, a TATA box polymorphism, has been found to be in complete linkage disequilibrium with the ILIB-511C/T polymorphism. Sporadic simple FS patients exhibited significantly higher frequencies of ILIB -31C/-511T alleles and homozygotes than controls (uncorrected p = 0.0094 and 0.0029, corrected p = 0.038 and 0.035, respectively), while no differences were observed in patients with all or familial simple FSs versus controls. There were no significant differences in the frequencies of -31C/T and -511C/T in the IL-IP promoter gene between complex FS patients and controls. The present study suggests that the IL-I beta gene contributes to a genetic susceptibility to the development of simple FSs of sporadic occurrence. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据