4.6 Article

Activation of NF-κB by extracellular matrix is involved in spreading and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion of pancreatic beta cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 280, 期 34, 页码 30630-30637

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M502493200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Laminin-5-rich extracellular matrix derived from 804G cells ( 804G-ECM) engages beta 1 integrins to induce spreading, improve glucose-stimulated insulin secretion ( GSIS), and increase survival of pancreatic beta cells. The present study examines whether 804G-ECM activates the transcriptional activity of NF-kappa B and the involvement of NF-kappa B in those effects of 804G-ECM on pancreatic beta cells. 804G-ECM induces nuclear translocation and the DNA binding activity of the p65 subunit of NF-kappa B. 804G-ECM-induced nuclear translocation of NF-kappa B was weak as compared with that induced by interleukin-1 beta. Transient 804G-ECM-induced DNA binding activity of NF-kappa B ( peak at 2 h) and overexpression of NF-kappa B target genes I kappa B alpha and NF-kappa B1( p105) ( peak at 4 h) were observed. When NF-kappa B was inhibited by an inhibitor of I kappa B alpha phosphorylation ( Bay 11-7082) or by a recombinant adenovirus expressing the nonphosphorylatable form of I kappa B alpha, 804G-ECM-induced cell spreading and actin cytoskeleton organization were reduced. GSIS from cells on 804G-ECM was inhibited 5-fold, whereas cell survival was not affected. In summary, the results indicate that 804G-ECM induces a transient and moderate NF-kappa B activity. This study shows for the first time that ECM- induced NF-kappa B activity is necessary in maintaining GSIS, although it does not affect survival of pancreatic beta cells. The effects of ECM- induced NF-kappa B activity contrast with the deleterious effects of cytokine-induced NF-kappa B activity. It is proposed that transient and moderate NF-kappa B activity is essential for proper function of the pancreatic beta cell.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据