4.4 Article

A profile of the residues in the first intracellular loop critical for Gs-mediated signaling of human prostacyclin receptor characterized by an integrative approach of NMR-experiment and mutagenesis

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 44, 期 34, 页码 11389-11401

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi050483p

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL56712, HL079389] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The first intracellular loop (iLP1, residues 39-51) of human prostacyclin receptor (IP) was proposed to be involved in signaling via its interaction with the G alpha s protein. First, evidence of the IP iLP1 interaction with the C-terminus of the G alpha s protein was observed by the fluorescence and NMR spectroscopy using the synthetic peptide (G alpha s-Ct) mimicking the C-terminal I I residues of the G alpha s protein in the presence of a constrained synthetic peptide mimicking the IP iLP1. Then, the residues (Arg42, Ala44, and Arg45) in the IP iLP1 peptide possibly involved in contacting the G alpha s-Ct peptide were initially assigned by observation of the significant proton resonance shifts of the side chains of the constrained IP iLP1 peptide using 2D H-1 NMR spectroscopy. The results of the NMR studies were used as a guide for further identification of the residues in the IP important to the receptor signaling using a recombinant protein approach. A profile of the residues in the IP iLP1, including the residues observed from the NMR studies involved in the G alpha s mediated signaling, was mapped out by mutagenesis. According to our results, it can be predicted that the seven residues (Arg42-Ala48) with the conserved Arg45 at the center will form an epitope with a specific conformation involved in the G alpha s mediated signaling. The conservation of the basic residues (Arg45 in the IP) in all of the prostanoid receptors suggests that the iLP1 regions of the other prostanoid receptors may also contain the epitopes important to their signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据