4.4 Article

Fourier transform infrared spectrum of the secondary quinone electron acceptor QB in photosystem II

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 44, 期 34, 页码 11323-11328

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi051237g

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fourier transform infrared difference spectra upon single reduction of the secondary quinone electron acceptor Q(B) in photosystem II (PSII), without a contribution from the electron donor-side signals, were obtained for the first time using Mn-depleted PSII core complexes of the thermophilic cyanobacterium Thermosynechococcus elongatus. The Q(B)(-)/Q(B) difference spectrum exhibited a strong Cl - O stretching band of the semiquinone anion at 1480 cm(-1), the frequency higher by 2 cm(-1) than that of the corresponding band of Q(A)(-), in agreement with the previous S(2)Q(B)(-)/S(1)Q(B) spectrum of the PSII membranes of spinach [Zhang, H., Fischer, G., and Wydrzynski, T. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 5511-5517]. Also, several peaks originating from the Fermi resonance of coupled His modes with its strongly H-bonded NH vibration were observed in the 2900-2600 cm(-1) region, where the peak frequencies were higher by 7-24 cm(-1) compared with those of the Q(A)(-)/Q(A) spectrum. These frequency differences suggest that H-bond interactions of the CO groups, especially with a His side chain, are different between Q(B)(-) and Q(A)(-). Furthermore, a prominent positive peak was observed at 1745 cm(-1) in the C=O stretching region of COOH or ester groups in the Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectrum. The peak frequency was unaffected by D2O substitution, indicating that this peak does not arise from a COOH group but probably from the 10a-ester C=O group of the pheophytin molecule adjacent to Q(B). The absence of protonation of carboxylic amino acids upon Q(B)(-) formation in contrast to the previous observation in the purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides suggests that the protonation mechanism of Q(B) in PSII is different from that of bacterial reaction centers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据