4.6 Article

Budget of organic carbon in a polluted atmosphere: Results from the New England Air Quality Study in 2002

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2004JD005623

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

[1] An extensive set of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulate organic matter (POM) was measured in polluted air during the New England Air Quality Study in 2002. Using VOC ratios, the photochemical age of the sampled air masses was estimated. This approach was validated ( 1) by comparing the observed rates at which VOCs were removed from the atmosphere with the rates expected from OH oxidation, ( 2) by comparing the VOC emission ratios inferred from the data with the average composition of urban air, and ( 3) by the ability to describe the increase of an alkyl nitrate with time in terms of the chemical kinetics. A large part of the variability observed for oxygenated VOCs (OVOCs) and POM could be explained by a description that includes the removal of the primary anthropogenic emissions, the formation and removal of secondary anthropogenic species, and a biogenic contribution parameterized by the emissions of isoprene. The OVOC sources determined from the data are compared with the available literature, and a satisfactory agreement is obtained. The observed sub-mu m POM was highly correlated with secondary anthropogenic gas- phase species, strongly suggesting that the POM was from secondary anthropogenic sources. The results are used to describe the speciation and total mass of gas- and particle-phase organic carbon as a function of the photochemical age of an urban air mass. Shortly after emission the organic carbon mass is dominated by primary VOCs, while after two days the dominant contribution is from OVOCs and sub-mu m POM. The total measured organic carbon mass decreased by about 40% over the course of two days. The increase in sub-mu m POM could not be explained by the removal of aromatic precursors alone, suggesting that other species must have contributed and/or that the mechanism for POM formation is more efficient than previously assumed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据