4.6 Article

Paraffin polydispersity facilitates mechanical gelation

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 18, 页码 7242-7254

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ie050325u

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Incipient wax-oil gel deposits form in crude oil transport pipelines when long-chain n-paraffins precipitate at the cold interior surface of the pipe wall. The kinetics of paraffin gel formation was studied using model fluids consisting of monodisperse and polydisperse n-paraffin components dissolved in petroleum mineral oil. Classical homogeneous nucleation theory was applied to investigate the supersaturation conditions necessary for crystal formation. Differential scanning calorimetry was used to monitor paraffin crystallization rates and to provide solidphase fraction measurements. Gelation occurs when growing n-paraffin crystals interlock and form a volume-spanning crystal network which entrains the remaining liquid oil among the crystals. Paraffin wax-oil gels exhibit a mechanical response to an imposed oscillatory stress, which is characterized by the elastic storage modulus G' being greater in magnitude than the viscous loss modulus, G. Low-temperature rheological gels can form from model fluids with n-paraffin contents as low as 0.5 wt %. Images of wax-oil gel morphologies were obtained using a cross-polarized microscope fitted with a z-drive and indicated crystal lengths of similar to 10-20 mu m. A microstructural gelation model based on percolation theory was introduced to provide predictions of gel formation conditions among randomly oriented paraffin crystals. The structural model provides correlations of crystal morphologies and solid fractions at the percolation threshold condition. Comparison of the initial wax contents required for gelation of monodisperse and polydisperse n-paraffin wax indicates that sharp crystal edges and ordered crystal faces hinder the paraffin crystal-crystal anchoring interactions which result in mechanical gelation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据