4.5 Article

Gestational diabetes in Iran: incidence, risk factors and pregnancy outcomes

期刊

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 69, 期 3, 页码 279-286

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2005.01.011

关键词

gestational diabetes mellitus; incidence; risk factors; outcomes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and compare fetal, maternal and neonatal complications amongst women with GDM and pregnant women with normal glucose tolerance in an urban Iranian population. In a prospective cohort study, universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus was performed for 13 10 pregnant women who were referred from private clinics and community health care centers to Fatemiyeh Hospital in Shahrood City. Screening was performed with a 50 g oral Glucose Challenge Test (GCT) with 130 mg/dI cut-off point, then a diagnostic 100 g Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) was done according to Carpenter and Coustan criteria. The incidence of GDM was 4.8%. There were differences in risk factors: age > 30 years, family history of diabetes, obesity, previous macrosomia, glycosuria between the two groups (P < 0.001). Women with GDM had a higher rate of stillbirth (P < 0.001; odds ratio 17.1, 95% CI = 4.5-65.5), hydramnios (P < 0.001; odds ratio 15.5, 95% CI = 4.8-50.5), gestational hypertension (P < 0.001; odds ratio 6, 95% CI = 2.3-15.3), macrosomia (P < 0.05; odds ratio 3.2, 95% CI = 1.2-8.6) and caesarean section (P < 0.001). We have found that the incidence of GDM in an urban Iranian population is similar to developed countries. Complications were more common in the GDM group than in the normal group and outcomes for women with persistent diabetes post-parturn were particularly poor. We recommend screening for GDM in Iran, but further evaluation of selective screening and cost effectiveness will need to be performed. Measures to improve the outcome of GDM pregnancy will also need to be addressed in the future. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据