4.4 Article

Calcium and protein phosphatase receptor activity in 1/2A attenuate N-methyl-D-aspartate the anoxic turtle cortex

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.07.017

关键词

protein phosphatase; calcium; NMDA receptors; turtle; cortex; anoxia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Excitotoxic cell death (ECD) is characteristic of mammalian brain following min of anoxia, but is not observed in the western painted turtle following days to months without oxygen. A key event in ECD is a massive increase in intracellular Ca2+ by over-stimulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs). The turtle's anoxia tolerance may involve the prevention of ECD by attenuating NMDAR-induced Ca2+ influx. The goal of this study was to determine if protein phosphatases (PPs) and intracellular calcium mediate reductions in turtle cortical neuron whole-cell NMDAR currents during anoxia, thereby preventing ECD. Whole-cell NMDAR currents did not change during 80 min of normoxia, but decreased 56% during 40 min of anoxia. Okadaic acid and calyculin A, inhibitors of serine/threonine PP1 and MA, potentiated NMDAR currents during normoxia and prevented anoxia-mediated attenuation of NMDAR currents. Decreases in NMDAR activity during anoxia were also abolished by inclusion of the Ca2+ chelator - BAPTA and the calmodulin inhibitor - calmidazolium. However, cypermethrin, an inhibitor of the Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent PP2B (calcineurin), abolished the anoxic decrease in NMDAR activity at 20, but not 40 min suggesting that this phosphatase might play an early role in attenuating NMDAR activity during anoxia. Our results show that PPs, Ca2+ and calmodulin play an important role in decreasing NMDAR activity during anoxia in the turtle cortex. We offer a novel mechanism describing this attenuation in which PP1 and 2A dephosphorylate the NMDAR (NR1 subunit) followed by calmodulin binding, a subsequent dissociation of alpha-actinin-2 from the NR1 subunit, and a decrease in NMDAR activity. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据