4.7 Article

Inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway with ruxolitinib overcomes cisplatin resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer NSCLC

期刊

APOPTOSIS
卷 19, 期 11, 页码 1627-1636

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10495-014-1030-z

关键词

Cisplatin; Resistance; JAK/STAT; Non-small cell lung cancer

资金

  1. National Nature and Science Foundation of China [81173579]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was aimed to elucidate the roles of inhibition of related JAK/STAT pathways in regulating cytotoxicity induced by cisplatin in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell. We treated five non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines with cisplatin alone or with cisplatin and Jak2 inhibitor (ruxolitinib) and assessed cell viability, expression of Jak2 and STAT3 and cell apoptosis. We also investigated the effect of combination treatment inhibited tumor xenograft growth in two human NSCLC xenograft models bearing the cisplatin resistant (H1299) and sensitive (A549) cells. Different cell lines with different genetic background showed half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of cisplatin from 4.66 to 68.28 A mu mol/L. They could be divided into cisplatin intrinsic resistant and cisplatin sensitive cell lines. In cisplatin-resistant cells with higher Jak2 and STAT3 expression, cisplatin and ruxolitinib combination dramatically suppressed the cell growth, down-regulated the expression of phosphorylated STAT3 and induced cleaved caspase-3 expression. Moreover combination with cisplatin and ruxolitinib also significantly inhibited the growth of resistant cell H1299, A549/DDP and H2347 in soft agar model. Finally, combination group significant inhibited the tumor growth and induced the caspase-3 expression compared with either single agent alone (P < 0.05) on the resistant cell xenografts model. The present study indicates that further study is warranted to determine the effectiveness of combination treatment with cisplatin and Jak2/stat3 pathway inhibitor for platinum-resistant NSCLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据