4.7 Article

Impregnated CuO/Al2O3 oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion:: Avoiding fluidized bed agglomeration

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 19, 期 5, 页码 1850-1856

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef050052f

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) is a combustion technology with inherent separation of the greenhouse gas CO2 that involves the use of an oxygen carrier, which transfers oxygen from air to the fuel avoiding the direct contact between them. An oxygen carrier in a CLC power plant must show high reaction rates and sufficient durability in successive cycle reactions. Furthermore, the oxygen carrier particles must not agglomerate. To produce materials with these characteristics, different Cu-based oxygen carriers with a range of CuO content between 10 and 26 wt% were prepared by impregnation using alumina as support. The particles were calcined at different temperatures in the range of 550-950 degrees C. The oxygen carriers were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray, and thermogravimetry. The samples were evaluated in a fluidized bed facility in order to determine their behavior in multicycle reduction-oxidation tests. A number of 100 cycles was done when the carrier did not agglomerate. The effects of metal content, calcination temperature, and method of preparation on the oxygen carriers reactivity, gas product distribution, attrition rate, and agglomeration were analyzed for the different oxygen carriers. It was observed that the CuO content in the oxygen carrier, the calcination temperature used in the preparation, and the conversion reached by the oxygen carrier during the reduction period affected the agglomeration process, In this work, the preparation conditions to produce Cu-based oxygen carriers with high reactivities, and small attrition rates were found. Moreover, the agglomeration of these oxygen carriers in the fluidized reactor, which is the main reason adduced in the literature to reject the Cu-based oxygen carriers for the CLC process, was avoided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据