4.7 Article

Hypoxic preconditioning protects microvascular endothelial cells against hypoxia/reoxygenation injury by attenuating endoplasmic reticulum stress

期刊

APOPTOSIS
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 85-98

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10495-012-0766-6

关键词

Hypoxic preconditioning; Hypoxia/reoxygenation; Microvascular endothelial cells; Endoplasmic reticulum stress

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81070186]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB944004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endothelial cells (ECs) are directly exposed to hypoxia and contribute to injury during myocardial ischemia/reperfusion. Hypoxic preconditioning (HPC) protects ECs against hypoxia injury. This study aimed to explore whether HPC attenuates hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) injury by suppressing excessive endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) in cultured microvascular ECs (MVECs) from rat heart. MVECs injury was measured by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) leakage, cytoskeleton destruction, and apoptosis. Expression of glucose regulating protein 78 (GRP78) and C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), activation of caspase-12 (pro-apoptosis factors) and phosphorylation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) were detected by western blot analysis. HPC attenuated H/R-induced LDH leakage, cytoskeleton destruction, and cell apoptosis, as shown by flow cytometry, Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, caspase-3 activation and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling. HPC suppressed H/R-induced ERS, as shown by a decrease in expression of GRP78 and CHOP, and caspase-12 activation. HPC enhanced p38 MAPK phosphorylation but decreased that of protein kinase R-like ER kinase (PERK, upstream regulator of CHOP). SB202190 (an inhibitor of p38 MAPK) abolished HPC-induced cytoprotection, downregulation of GRP78 and CHOP, and activation of caspase-12, as well as PERK phosphorylation. HPC may protect MVECs against H/R injury by suppressing CHOP-dependent apoptosis through p38 MAPK mediated downregulation of PERK activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据